Blog posts

Archive video footage from EU projects
... We are in the last twelve months of the MOTIVATE project and we have started producing video clips about the technology that is being developed.  So, if you missed my presentations at the conference in the US then you can watch the videos online using the links below . We have been making videos describing the outputs of our EU project for about 20 years; so, if you want to see some vintage footage of me twenty years younger then watch a video from the INDUCE project that was active from 1998 to 2001....

MOTIVATE videos: Introduction; Industrial calibration of DIC measurements using a calibration plate or using an LCD screen

 This blog post appeared on June 5th, 2019, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com
In Einstein's footsteps?
... I have been involved in organising a number of workshops in Glasgow, London, Munich and Shanghai over the last decade.  The next one will be in Zurich in November 2019 in Guild Hall of Carpenters (Zunfthaus zur Zimmerleuten) where Einstein lectured in November 1910 to the Zurich Physical Society ‘On Boltzmann’s principle and some of its direct consequences‘.  Our subject will be different: ‘Validation of Computational Mechanics Models’; ...  This blog post appeared on February 27th, 2019, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com
Industrial uncertainty
Last month I spent almost a week in Zurich. ... I was there for the mid-term meeting of the MOTIVATE project and to conduct some tests and demonstrations in the laboratories of our host, EMPA, the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology.  Two of our project partners, Dantec Dynamics GmbH based in Ulm, Germany, and the Athena Research Centre in Patras, Greece, have developed methods for quantifying the uncertainty present in measurements of deformation made in an industrial environment using digital image correlation ... This blog post appeared on December 12th, 2018, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com
Spontaneously MOTIVATEd
Some posts arise spontaneously, stimulated by something that I have read or done, while others are part of commitment to communicate on a topic related to my research... This blog post on a new validation metric and flowchart appeared on June 27th, 2018, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com
Brave New World
In the brave new world of digital engineering, some engineers are attempting to conceive of a world in which experiments have become obsolete because we can rely on computational modelling to simulate engineering systems. ... This blog post on a world without experiments appeared on January 10th, 2018, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com
Getting smarter
Garbage in, garbage out (GIGO) is a perennial problem in computational simulations of engineering structures... This blog post is on how predictions from the simulation have to be tested against reality in order to establish confidence. It appeared on August 2nd, 2017, on realizeengineering.wordpress.com

DIC Calibration Methods

Methods for quantifying DIC measurement uncertainty in an industrial environment
DIC Measurement uncertainty

We evaluated the state-of-the-art for quantifying measurement uncertainty of digital image correlation and assessed potential candidate techniques for evaluating the uncertainty during 1:1 aircraft scale optical strain and displacement measurements.

From there we developed two specific methods for experiments performed in industrial situations. The methods can be performed at the time of the test and quantify measurement uncertainty in the whole measurement volume in a manner that is relevant to the validation of predictive numerical models. This step significantly improves the quality of laboratory-based DIC measurements.

The first method is based on using a calibration plate in front of the test object and a rigid body displacement of the camera system. The methodology is illustrated in this video. A typical result is displayed in the figure below.

The second method uses an LCD screen in front of the test object which displays simulated speckle patterns that are numerically deformed to represent planar strain states. The methodology is illustrated in this video.

 

/documents/1583244/0/MU_DIC_3/981a1b12-b797-4813-ac48-f47e7784e3ba?t=1559111459230
Deviations of position data from DIC measurement after calibrating the system in front of the test object. They form the basis for estimating the DIC measurement uncertainty.

MU_DIC_3 (Version 1.0)

Thumbnail Uploaded by Erwin Hack, 5/29/19 8:30 AM

Version 1.0

Last Updated by Erwin Hack
5/29/19 8:30 AM
Status: Approved
Download (331k) Get URL.
Version History
Version Date Size  
1.0 26 Days Ago 331k

MU_DIC_4 (Version 1.0)

Thumbnail Uploaded by Erwin Hack, 5/27/19 3:55 PM

Version 1.0

Last Updated by Erwin Hack
5/27/19 3:55 PM
Status: Approved
Download (591k) Get URL.
Version History
Version Date Size  
1.0 27 Days Ago 591k

MU_DIC_2 (Version 1.0)

Thumbnail Uploaded by Erwin Hack, 5/27/19 3:06 PM

Version 1.0

Last Updated by Erwin Hack
5/27/19 3:06 PM
Status: Approved
Download (568k) Get URL.
Version History
Version Date Size  
1.0 27 Days Ago 568k